·
A-Z Index
·
EHS Home
PROGRAM AREAS
Workplace Safety
Personal Protection
Fire Safety
Food Safety
Biological Safety
Chemical Safety
Environmental Issues
Hazardous Materials
Radiation Safety
RESOURCES
·
Forms/Manuals
·
Training
·
Emergencies
·
Links
·
About EHS
Incident Response
|
Site Map
|
Application Process
|
OHSP
|
Biosafety Committee
|
Lab Practices
|
Programs
Laboratory Practices
Disinfectants
Alcohols
Advantages
Disadvantages
highly effective bactericides
effective tuberculocidal agents
effective virucidal agents
time to kill - in seconds
pleasant odor
evaporation without residue formation
non-staining
cleansing activity
easily obtainable and used
generally nontoxic
non-irritating
inexpensive
stable when stored properly
non-allergenic
nonsporicidal
activity against hydrophilic viruses questionable
skin and mucous membrane irritation
organic matter interference
volatile flammable
some incompatibility with rubber and plastic materials
inventory and procurement problems
not registered as a disinfectant by EPA
Back to Table
Chlorine Compounds
Advantages
Disadvantages
wide spectrum of rapid biocidal properties
deodorizing/sanitizing properties
facility of handling and use
low levels of toxicity and irritancy
insignificant residues
non-staining and colorless
acceptable odor
low cost
sporicidal properties questionable
skin irritation on prolonged contact
possible bronchial irritation from inhalation
general caustic effects
corrosion of metals
Product deterioration on standing
bleaching effect on fabrics
non-wetting action
not registered as disinfectant by EPA
possible CO-carcinogenic properties
Back to Table
Formaldehyde
Advantages
Disadvantages
wide spectrum of biocidal properties
excellent vapor phase disinfectant paraformaldehyde
can be rapidly neutralized
active in the presence of organic matter
relatively inexpensive
readily available
stable when properly stored
registered as a disinfectant by EPA
extremely pungent and suffocating odor
skin and mucous membrane irritant
can cause allergic dermatitis
Back to Table
Glutaraldehyde
Advantages
Disadvantages
broad spectrum of antimicrobial properties
relatively rapid disinfecting action - 10 minutes
good activity in presence of organic matter
comparability with metal, rubber, and plastic materials
low volatility (vapor pressure like water)
nonflammable
EPA registered as disinfectant
EPA registered as a sporicide
activation required
rinsing required to remove residual disinfectant
slightly to moderately toxic
tissue irritation (especially to eyes and mucous membranes)
not recommended for carbon steel surfaces
definite shelf-life
can cause allergic contact dermatitis
Back to Table
Iodophors
Advantages
Disadvantages
powerful germicidal properties of iodine
readily miscible with water
relatively free of toxicity and irritancy
almost colorless and nonstaining
safe and convenient to use
powerful detergent action
stable in storage
generally non-corrosive
EPA registered as a disinfectant
corrosiveness of some surfaces
unstable above 54 oC
relatively expensive
not considered instrument-safe
Back to Table
Phenolics
Advantages
Disadvantages
Wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity
Readily miscible with additives (e.g. soap)
Many formulations available
Good cleansing action
Good sanitizer/germicide for housekeeping
EPA registered as a disinfectant
Phenol coefficient readily attainable
Relatively poor sporicide
Possesses unpleasant odor
skin and mucous membrane irritant
Toxic
Inactivated by organic matter
Materials incompatible (stains and ordors)
Relatively expensive
Back to Table
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds
Advantages
Disadvantages
Good disinfectant action - Gram (+) microbes
Possess detergent and surfactant properties
Soluble in water and alcohol
Almost odorless (pleasant aromatic smell)
Generally nontoxic and non-allergenic
Materials compatible
Easily prepared and used
Useful for sanitizing applications
EPA registered as a disinfectant
Inexpensive
Decreased activity against Gram (-) microbes
Lack tuberculocidal properties
No sporicidal activity
Poor activity against hydrophilic viruses
Poor activity against pseudomonads
Development of resistant bacterial strains
Not effective against all nosocomial infections
Incompatible with soaps
Substantial interference by organic matter
Inactivated by stoppers, gauze, cotton, etc.
Reports of contact dermatitis
Back to Table
Add to Favorites
Revised:
26 Apr. 2007.
Copyright
© 2008 The Curators of the
University of Missouri
.
Environmental Health and Safety
8 Research Park Development Building
·
Columbia, Missouri 65211
(573) 882-7018
·
Fax: (573) 882-7940
·
Invidividual e-mail addresses are only viewable by browsers that support JavaScript, in order to prevent spammers from harvesting these addresses from our site. If you'd like the e-mail address of an MU faculty or staff member, please visit the
Find A Person
form, or write us at
ehs@missouri.edu
. If you write us, please include the URL of the page in question. We apologize for the inconvenience.
For emergency service at night, weekends or holidays, call MU Police (573) 882-7201