Recognizing Excellence in Laboratory Safety 

The Safety MVP Award celebrates individuals who go above and beyond in fostering a culture of safety within their research environments. This year's honorees, Wing-Cheung Lai and Anand Soorneedi, represent two distinct corners of the research world—one a staff scientist with twenty-five years of institutional memory, the other a virology researcher bringing federal safety standards to the university. Yet both share a common commitment: treating safety not as a checklist, but as a shared responsibility. 

 

Photo of Wing Lai, MU Researcher

 

Wing Lai: The Institutional Anchor 

When asked about the nature of his work, Wing-Cheung Lai explains that his research focuses on the study of protein translocation, using biophysical methods and cryo-EM to deduce structures and functions. This involves working with Legionella pneumophila, the bacterium responsible for a severe form of pneumonia and studying its T4 secretion system—the mechanism it uses to infect human cells. 

As Clarissa Durie noted in her nomination, Lai is a staff scientist in the Durie lab in Biochemistry who was recently recognized for 25 years with the university. Most of that time, he worked with the Hazelbauer and Randall labs. As they retired, he transitioned to Durie's new lab and has supported its start-up period, including training every new member in the safe operation of equipment and best practices, including BSL2 protocols. Durie describes him as "a valued member of the department and a go-to resource for institutional knowledge." 

Safety, Lai notes, is integrated into his daily routine from the moment he enters the lab. "Good lab safety is proper science," he says. "Contamination of bacteria is prevented by good housekeeping and proper labeling. It's about maintaining control over your work." 

The most common practices in his lab reflect this constant vigilance. "Wearing PPE is for everyone in the space, every day—including those only using equipment for a short while," Lai states. "Key elements are clear signage, easy access to Safety Data Sheets, a maintained chemical inventory, and accessible areas for handling chemicals and biohazardous materials, with cleaning supplies readily available." 

Beyond his own research, Lai takes an active role in enforcing these standards. "I go on 'patrol' to make sure lab workers and others are using proper PPE," he comments. He emphasizes that something as simple as a lab coat serves a dual purpose: protecting the researcher while also requiring proper care. "We must disinfect our lab coats because of our handling of bacteria." 

Finally, he offers a crucial insight for anyone looking to improve their own safety practices. "It is important to build good habits," Lai adds. "Those will last a long time." 

 

Photo of Anand Soorneedi, MU Researcher

 

Anand Soorneedi: The Culture Carrier 

Anand Soorneedi works in a virology lab, handling high-consequence pathogens at the BSL-3 level. His research focuses on developing tools to combat emerging threats like the Heartland virus—a tick-borne virus discovered in Missouri—and Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Virus (SFTSV). 

In his nomination, Soorneedi articulated a philosophy that sets him apart. "I consistently treat safety as a shared responsibility, not a checklist item," he wrote. "I quietly notice what others miss—an unsecured gas cylinder, missing secondary containment, an outdated SOP—and fix it or raise it immediately, without blame or drama. What sets me apart is how I model safety culture by example: I stop my own experiments to help someone don proper PPE, help build safer workflows into protocols from the start instead of adding them as an afterthought, and I communicate clearly and respectfully across all levels of the lab. In doing so, I don't just follow our safety expectations—I elevate them and make it easier for everyone around me to work safely every day." 

When asked how safety plays a role in his daily routine, Soorneedi's answer is direct. "Extremely important, especially at the BSL-3 level," he says. "We work with infectious viral agents, so safety is our number one priority—and not just for me, but for everyone in the lab. Everyone has to play their part because of the nature of our work." 

The most common practices in his lab reflect the seriousness of the materials they handle. "Everything we work with is at least BSL-2 level, so at minimum we are wearing lab coats, eye protection, and sometimes masks," he explains. "We use fume hoods when working with volatile materials, and when we are working at the BSL-3 level, we wear PAPRs and Tyvek suits that help protect us." 

Soorneedi brings a unique perspective to his role, shaped by experience at the federal level. "I worked for the NIH before I started working for Mizzou," he shares, "and the NIH and the CDC are the entities that dictate the rules of safety, so I gained a lot of experience in safety lab culture." 

His final message echoes the collaborative spirit that defines his approach. "Lab safety is a team effort," Soorneedi adds, "and everyone should help with the heavy lifting." 

 

Building a Culture That Lasts 

Together, Lai and Soorneedi represent two generations of safety leadership—one rooted in decades of institutional knowledge and habit-building, the other shaped by federal standards and a commitment to shared responsibility. Both demonstrate that true safety excellence isn't found in a manual or a checklist, but in the daily choices researchers make: the patrol through the lab, the offer to help with PPE, the quiet fix of an unsecured cylinder. 

As Lai puts it, "Build good habits. Those will last a long time." 

 

Article by Chris Pearman and Colette Faiella

Building a Stronger Culture of Safety

The University of Missouri recently concluded another successful Lab Safety Awareness Week, reinforcing our shared commitment to protecting people, research, and discovery. Hosted by Environmental Health & Safety (EHS) in partnership with the Office of Research, the week emphasized practical safety skills, meaningful outreach, and recognition of individuals who lead by example in our research community—all grounded in our guiding message: Safer Together.

Throughout the week, EHS staff engaged with students, faculty, staff, and the research community through hands-on outreach, informal discussions, and safety demonstrations, strengthening connections and reinforcing shared responsibility for safe research. These interactions provided valuable opportunities to answer questions, discuss real-world laboratory safety challenges, and build relationships across campus—because safety works best when we approach it together.

 

Hands-On Training and Educational Programming

Educational programming during the week included:

  • A Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) presentation from Fisher Scientific and Ansell, focused on glove selection, lab coats, and eye and face protection to help researchers make informed PPE decisions.
  • A Compressed Gas Safety presentation from Airgas, covering safe cylinder handling, storage, transport, and regulator use in laboratory and research environments.
  • Hands-on Digital Fire Extinguisher Training, which provided instruction on proper fire extinguisher selection, how to safely operate an extinguisher, and—critically—how to assess a situation and determine when it is appropriate to use an extinguisher versus when to evacuate the building and call for emergency assistance.
  • EHS Safety trivia designed to reinforce that safety is an everyday prevalence, and outreach activities designed to make safety approachable and engaging.
Recognizing Safety Leadership: The Safety MVP Award

A key feature of Lab Safety Awareness Week was the Safety MVP Award, which recognizes individuals who demonstrate an exceptional commitment to laboratory safety and positively influence their teams. Nominations opened during the week, allowing peers to highlight those who consistently lead by example.

Congratulations to this year’s Safety MVP Award recipients:

  • Anand Soorneedi
  • Wing Cheung Lai

 

Fire Extinguisher Demo & Friendly Competition

The popular Fire Extinguisher Demo added a fun and competitive element, challenging participants to apply what they learned by responding quickly and correctly in a simulated fire scenario. 

Congratulations to our standout performers:

  • Fastest Time – $50 Mizzou Store Gift Card: Kritika Prasai
  • Second Fastest Time – $30 Mizzou Store Gift Card: Riti Shrestha
Prize Winners & Campus Partnerships

Additionally, EHS held a Lab Safety Awareness Week Prize Raffle. By nominating a Safety MVP or playing Safety trivia, participants were entered into a drawing for four grand prizes, and winners are as follows:

  • 4 Mizzou Men’s Basketball Tickets: Henry Mosher
  • 4 Mizzou Women’s Basketball Tickets: Andrew Knott
  • Free Parking for One Year: Mather Khan
  • Venture Out Experience for 8: Brendon Koester

EHS extends a special thank you to MU Parking, MU Athletics, and Mizzou Rec for generously donating prizes and helping make Lab Safety Awareness Week a success.

Safer Together

Lab Safety Awareness Week is about more than prizes or presentations—it is about visibility, partnership, and shared responsibility. By being Safer Together as a community, we continue building a strong culture of safety that supports excellence in research at Mizzou.

 

Article by Ahmed Elsotouhy

Peroxide-forming chemicals are common in academic research laboratories and are often used without incident for years. However, when these materials are stored too long, concentrated, or improperly disposed of, they can quietly become one of the most serious explosion hazards in the research environment. Solvents such as diethyl ether and tetrahydrofuran (THF), as well as unintentionally formed organic peroxides, can accumulate shock-sensitive compounds that pose significant risk to researchers, facilities, and operations.

A review of peroxide-related laboratory incidents at universities over the past several decades shows a clear pattern: most accidents did not occur during complex experiments, but during routine activities like laboratory clean-outs, rotary evaporation, or hazardous waste handling. In several well-documented cases, aged solvents that had not been tested for peroxides detonated when containers were opened, concentrated, or discarded. In others, peroxide residues in “empty” bottles exploded when handled as ordinary glass waste. These incidents highlight that peroxide hazards are not theoretical—they are predictable and repeatable when controls fail.

Major University Peroxide Incidents
  • UCSF (1995): Ten-year-old diethyl ether containers exploded during a laboratory clean-out, shattering windows.
    Cause: Long-term storage and high peroxide accumulation.
  • UC Berkeley (2006): Unstabilized THF (>100 mg/L peroxides) detonated during rotary evaporation, injuring a student.
    Cause: Concentration of peroxide crystals during near-dry evaporation.
  • University of Minnesota (2017): An “empty” solvent bottle containing dry peroxide crystals exploded when discarded.
    Cause: Shock-sensitive peroxide residues in an untreated container.
  • University of Bristol (2017): Approximately 30–40 g of TATP formed unintentionally during an acetone/hydrogen peroxide reaction; a controlled detonation was required.
    Cause: Unintended peroxide byproduct and insufficient hazard mitigation.
  • Hong Kong Laboratory (2016): Expired hydrogen peroxide decomposed violently when poured into a metal waste drum, injuring eight individuals.
    Cause: Incompatible container and degraded oxidizer.
Peroxide-Forming Chemicals: What Goes Wrong—and How to Prevent It

Common Failure Modes

  • Long-term storage of ethers and THF
  • Lack of container dating or routine peroxide testing
  • Evaporation or distillation to near-dryness
  • Disposal of untreated “empty” containers
  • Inadequate assessment of unintended peroxide-forming reaction pathways

Prevention Essentials

  • Date all peroxide-forming chemicals and enforce strict expiration timelines
  • Test for peroxides before evaporation, distillation, or disposal
  • Store materials in cool, dark locations and minimize quantities on hand
  • Treat “empty” containers as hazardous; avoid metal containers for oxidizers
  • Provide regular, peroxide-specific safety training
  • Require PI and EHS review of aging or high-risk peroxide-forming chemicals
Root Causes and Prevention

Across institutions, common root causes emerge. Prolonged storage of peroxide-forming chemicals, lack of routine peroxide testing, underestimation of risks associated with near-dry evaporation, and improper disposal practices were present in nearly every documented incident. Importantly, these hazards were already well documented in safety literature, underscoring that the issue is not a lack of knowledge, but inconsistent application of best practices across the chemical lifecycle.

Preventing peroxide incidents starts with strong inventory management: dating containers upon receipt and opening, limiting storage time, and removing aged materials before they become dangerous. Peroxide testing should be performed before evaporation, distillation, or disposal, and “empty” containers must be treated as potentially hazardous until verified safe. Just as critical is ongoing training—for students, staff, and faculty—so that peroxide risks remain visible even when experiments become routine.

Faculty and principal investigators play a central role in this process by setting expectations for safe solvent handling, prohibiting near-dry evaporation without verification, and prioritizing laboratory clean-outs during personnel transitions or lab closures. From an EHS perspective, peroxide hazards should be explicitly addressed in inspections, waste procedures, Chemical Hygiene Plans, and safety training programs, using real incident examples to reinforce why these requirements matter.

To support these efforts, MU Environmental Health & Safety is happy to provide peroxide-forming chemical test strips to laboratories, including a starter kit with instructions for use and reordering. This service is intended to make routine peroxide testing easy, accessible, and consistent across campus.

Peroxide-forming chemical incidents are preventable when vigilance, testing, and oversight are consistently applied. By managing these materials from procurement through disposal—and by learning from past incidents—we can protect our researchers and facilities while strengthening our shared safety culture. By working Safer Together, we help ensure that innovation and discovery continue without unnecessary risk.

researcher using a biosafety cabinet

 

Article by Colette Faiella and David Rehard

At the heart of much of our work with cell cultures and biohazardous materials is a critical piece of engineering control: the Biological Safety Cabinet (BSC). It serves as a primary barrier, protecting both the user and the product. However, this equipment is only as effective as the practices of the person using it.

Using a BSC safely is not just an individual responsibility—it directly impacts the shared laboratory environment and the colleagues who work in these spaces. Every step in the process, from preparation to cleanup, plays a role in maintaining a safe and compliant laboratory.

Preparation: The Foundation of Safe Work

Safe BSC use begins before your hands enter the cabinet. Proper preparation ensures the cabinet is functioning as intended.

  • Purge & Verify
    Always allow the cabinet to run for its required purge time (typically 5 minutes). This step clears particulates and establishes proper airflow, which is essential for effective containment.
  • Check Your Defenses
    Verify that the sash is set at the correct operating height and that alarms are functioning properly. Confirm the certification sticker is current; BSCs are required to be certified annually.
During Work: Mindful Movements for Maximum Containment

Once work begins, user technique has a direct impact on containment effectiveness and sample integrity.

  • Zoning for Safety
    Organize the workspace from clean to dirty, keeping sterile items separated from waste and contaminated materials. This layout helps minimize cross-contamination and protects both your work and subsequent users.
  • The Human Factor
    Move arms in and out of the cabinet slowly and deliberately. Avoid quick or sweeping motions that can disrupt the protective air curtain. BSCs are designed for single-user operation. If a procedure requires two users, it must be reviewed and approved through a documented risk assessment with the Laboratory Supervisor.
  • Ergonomics Matter
    Adjust your stool and posture so your face remains above the sash and your arms enter the cabinet comfortably. Proper ergonomics reduce fatigue and help prevent errors.
Completion: Leaving the Cabinet Ready for the Next User

How the cabinet is left after use affects everyone who works in the lab.

  • Decontaminate in Place
    Do not turn off the cabinet during cleanup. Close and surface-decontaminate all containers, equipment, and the exterior of biohazard bags inside the BSC before removing them. This step prevents contamination of the surrounding laboratory.
  • Thorough Cleaning
    Decontaminate the entire interior of the cabinet, including the work surface, side walls, and the inside of the sash.
  • Secure the Cabinet
    Follow your laboratory’s SOP for shutdown procedures, including lights, blower, and UV light use (if applicable), ensuring the sash is closed.

When each user takes ownership of proper BSC practices, we strengthen a shared culture of responsibility and reinforce what it means to work Safer Together.

BSC Certification Update

Environmental Health & Safety (EHS) is currently working to identify and evaluate Biological Safety Cabinet certification vendors to support continued compliance and service needs across campus. This effort is being conducted in collaboration with Procurement and other campus partners, with the goal of establishing reliable certification resources for the entire University of Missouri System.

Additional information will be shared as this process moves forward. In the meantime, laboratories should continue to ensure their BSCs remain within the required annual certification period and notify EHS if certification concerns or scheduling issues arise.

For the most current updates on BSC certification vendors and scheduling, please visit the EHS website.

Resource Reminder

For additional training please visit the EHS Training Courses website.
Biosafety Cabinet Safety

 

 

Article by Mason Sherwood

Safer Together: Strengthening Lab Safety One Bottle at a Time

As part of our mission to be Safer Together, MU Environmental Health & Safety regularly conducts inspections in laboratories throughout campus. One of the most frequent violations we encounter when inspecting chemical laboratories is the improper storage of chemicals. For example, a common instance involves flammable and oxidizing materials, or acids and bases being stored together.  

Practicing safe chemical storage is key and a vital step you can take to ensure a safe laboratory environment, minimizing the risk of chemical leaks, spills, and reactions. MU EHS has several recommendations and guidelines to help you take the right steps to keeping your lab safe. This can include actions such as separating chemicals by their hazard classification, labeling containers, and more.  

Here are 5 Quick & Easy Steps You Can Take: 
  1. Always Label Used and Unused Chemical Containers  

  • Ensure that all chemical containers, used or unused, display the proper chemical name, hazards, etc.

  • All hazardous waste containers need to have a green Hazardous Waste Label properly filled out, which can be provided by EHS. 

  • Peroxide Formers and Unstable Compounds have additional requirements to consider. Please see the MU EHS Chemical Storage and Segregation page for more information.  

  1. Maintain an Up-to-Date Chemical Inventory

  • This step can be critical to catching any deteriorating chemicals in your inventory and prevent unnecessary purchases of the same chemicals.  

  • If you have any overstocked unused chemicals that you do not need, they can be submitted to EHS via a lab cleanout or hazardous materials pickup request.  

  1. Familiarize Yourself with Hazard Classifications 

  • Recognize the pictograms and words associated with different hazard classifications 

  • Below are the pictograms taken from the MU EHS Hazard and Warning Pictograms Library for common hazards seen in chemical laboratories:  

Diagram 1, SmartArt diagram 

Diagram 2, SmartArt diagram

Diagram 3, SmartArt diagram

 

  1. Label Storage Containers 

  • To help keep things organized, label containers with the specific hazard that will be stored inside.  

  • For example, flammable materials should be stored in a specific Flammable Safety Cabinet, which is marked with a highly visible label. Corrosive cabinets can be designated as an “Acid” or a “Base” cabinet to ensure segregation.  

  1. Reach out to MU EHS 

  • If you feel that you are unsure about the proper storage techniques for a chemical, please feel free to reach out to MU EHS at either of the following lines and we will be more than happy to provide recommendations and guidance: 

  • Main Line: (573) 882-7018 

  • Hazardous Materials Unit: (573) 882-3736 

Additionally, you can view the MU EHS pages on Chemical Storage and Segregation and Chemical Labeling for general guidelines, and the Hazards and Warnings Pictogram Library located on the Hazard Communication Sign page.  

 

 

Article by Colette Faiella, Photo of Erin East performing a radioactive package survey. 

 

The Receiving End: A Look at Mizzou's Hottest Deliveries 

How does radioactive material safely arrive on a busy campus? It’s a key responsibility of Environmental Health & Safety (EHS), supervised and regulated by our dedicated Radiation Safety Staff. From the moment a package arrives to its final decommissioning, we have rigorous protocols in place. Our Radiation Safety Specialist explains the process. 

What We Do: RAM Package Receipt and Delivery 

Our department plays a vital role in managing the safe and compliant handling of Radioactive Material (RAM) packages at the University of Missouri. For those unfamiliar with our process, here’s a simplified look at how we ensure radioactive materials are handled properly from the moment they arrive to the point of delivery. 

Before a RAM package even reaches campus, a permitted individual must submit a RAM Requisition. This entry includes key information about the expected package, such as the type of radionuclide and its physical form. These requisitions help us prepare for incoming shipments and ensure everything is in place for a safe and efficient receipt. 

Once a package arrives at our facility, it must be processed within three working hours in accordance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations. Our trained team inspects each package, checks for removable contamination by swiping the exterior, and measures radiation levels to confirm compliance with Department of Transportation (DOT) limits. Until verified, every package is treated as potentially contaminated. 

If the package meets all safety standards, its information is entered into our inventory system (EHSA), the necessary documentation is completed, and it’s prepared for delivery. We use a designated and secured university vehicle for RAM transport, with strict safety procedures in place throughout the journey. Upon arrival at the delivery location, we conduct another contamination check to ensure the package remained secure in transit. 

The package is then handed off directly to an authorized radiation worker, who signs the paperwork to confirm receipt. Once delivery is complete, we finalize records and analyze the transport swipe to ensure everything is compliant and properly documented. 

From start to finish, our team works to ensure radioactive materials are handled responsibly, tracked accurately, and delivered safely — all while supporting the important research taking place at Mizzou. 

by Chris Pearman and Kevin Fasken

Environmental Health & Safety, in partnership with MURR Safety Staff, is pleased to announce that venting caps are now available for campus laboratories. These specialized caps are designed to prevent dangerous pressure buildup in chemical waste containers, helping to keep our researchers and facilities safe. 

Our campus has experienced several chemical spills in the past linked to piranha solution reactions. When powerful oxidizing mixtures or other gassy waste materials are sealed in containers, they can build up significant pressure. This pressure can cause containers to rupture, leading to dangerous spills and unnecessary hazards. Venting caps provide a simple, effective safeguard by allowing pressure to escape in a controlled manner, helping protect both researchers and facilities. 

Using these caps is a proactive step toward protecting our people, equipment, and research. This simple addition helps you maintain a secure lab environment and stay in compliance with safety regulations.  

Laboratories can request venting caps directly through the EHS Assistant Waste Supply Request tool. This convenient option ensures labs can quickly obtain the supplies they need to maintain safe storage practices. 

To request venting caps or learn more about their use, please contact EHS at labsafety@missouri.edu. Together, we can reduce risks and continue building a safer research environment at Mizzou. 

 

by Chris Pearman and Colette Faiella

At the University of Missouri, our laboratories are spaces of innovation and discovery — but also environments where safety must be prioritized. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is a fundamental part of that safety equation. Whether you're pipetting hazardous chemicals, analyzing samples under high pressure, or just walking through a lab space, your PPE choices matter — not only for your safety, but for the broader research community. 

Minimum PPE Requirements for Laboratories 

All individuals entering a lab space where hazardous materials are present must meet the university’s minimum PPE expectations: 

  • Lab Clothing: Clothing must fully cover the torso, full-length pants must cover the legs, and closed-toe, closed-heel footwear is mandatory. Shorts, skirts above the ankle, and open-toe or open-heel shoes (like sandals or clogs) are not allowed.  

  • Lab Coats: A properly sized lab coat must be worn, fully buttoned, and with sleeves extending to the wrists. The coat must provide full coverage of the torso. 

  • Protective Eyewear: All lab personnel must wear ANSI Z87-certified safety glasses or goggles. Standard prescription glasses without side protection do not meet this standard, however prescription safety glasses can be ordered. 

These are the standard minimum requirements for every space where hazards are present and/or being used, if the Permitted Individual requires workers/etc. to have additional PPE when in the space, that is at the discretion of that PI. 

When PPE Is (and Isn't) Required 

While PPE is expected during nearly all lab activity, EHS recognizes there are specific situations where not wearing PPE is permissible. These include: 

  1. Clean Zones: Designated areas approved by the PI where hazardous materials are not handled. 

  1. Brief, No-Contact Visits: When someone enters a lab momentarily without interacting with materials or equipment. 

  1. Inactive Labs: When no hazardous materials are in use and the lab poses no present risk. 

Even in these cases, individuals must remain vigilant and don appropriate PPE if conditions change. 

Compliance and Accountability 

To foster a consistent safety culture, PPE usage is monitored during routine laboratory inspections. Compliance observations are recorded at the Principal Investigator (PI) level, meaning: 

  • If all lab occupants meet PPE standards, the PI is marked as compliant. 

  • If any individual is out of compliance, the PI receives a non-compliant observation. 

These results are shared directly with PIs and rolled up to academic leadership, including Deans and the Provost, to encourage accountability and institutional support for lab safety. 

Remember: PPE is not just a box to check — it’s the last line of defense between you and serious injury. At Mizzou, we’re committed to protecting your health while supporting world-class research. 

Let’s make safety a habit — not an afterthought. 

Support and Resources 

Need help selecting PPE or sourcing safety glasses and lab coats? The EHS team is here to help. Visit https://ehs.missouri.edu/program-areas/personal-protection for guidance on: 

  • Choosing the right lab coat and eyewear 

  • Ordering PPE through Mizzou’s approved vendors 

  • Signage, training tools, and more 

For questions or consultation, email: labsafety@missouri.edu 

At the University of Missouri, maintaining high-quality drinking water is essential not just for day-to-day campus operations but also for the integrity of scientific research. The Consumer Confidence Report (CCR), is an annual water quality summary that every community water system in Missouri must provide to its customers. Since the University operates its own drinking water distribution system and supplies water to most of the MU campus, it is required to prepare and distribute the annual CCR to the campus community. The CCR, which is required by the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and overseen by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), provides valuable information about the quality of water supplied to our campus. 

What Does the Consumer Confidence Report Include?

The CCR offers a comprehensive overview of the water quality and the potential impact of contaminants on health and safety. Key details include:

  • Source of Drinking Water:  e.g., surface water (rivers, lakes) or groundwater (wells, aquifers).
  • Contaminant Levels: A breakdown of any detected substances, such as nitrates, lead, and arsenic, with a comparison to established safety limits.
  • Contaminant Sources: Information on where contaminants may come from, like agricultural runoff or plumbing corrosion.
  • Health Impacts: Descriptions of potential risks if contaminants exceed safety standards.
  • Violations and Corrective Actions: Any exceedances of safety levels, along with steps taken to resolve these issues.
  • Compliance and Vulnerability: Details on compliance with water safety standards and the susceptibility of our water sources to contamination.

This information helps ensure that the drinking water provided on campus is safe and that MU is compliant with all applicable state and federal water quality regulations.

Why MU Researchers Should Care About the CCR

For researchers at MU, the quality of water used in experiments is more than a regulatory concern—it is integral to the reliability and accuracy of research results. The following points highlight why the CCR is a critical resource for researchers:

  1. Ensuring Experiment Accuracy:
    Even trace contaminants—such as lead, copper, or disinfection byproducts—can interfere with sensitive scientific instruments or impact the accuracy of experiments. The CCR provides specific data about these contaminants, allowing researchers to understand potential challenges in their work and make adjustments as needed.
  2. Supporting Water Purification Needs:
    For certain experiments, researchers may need to purify water further (e.g., using deionization or reverse osmosis) to meet the exacting standards of their protocols. By reviewing the CCR, researchers can determine whether additional purification steps are required to meet these needs.
  3. Protecting Research Quality:
    In fields like biomedical research, environmental science, and chemistry, the purity of water used in experiments can directly influence cell viability, data integrity, and chemical reactions. Understanding the baseline quality of campus water is essential for ensuring that research protocols yield reliable results.
  4. Compliance and Grant Support:
    Many research projects, especially those involving animal models or tissue cultures, require compliance with regulatory standards for water quality. The CCR provides crucial documentation to support this compliance, which is often needed when applying for grant funding or when demonstrating laboratory conditions during inspections or audits.
  5. Advancing Public Health and Environmental Research:
    The CCR is also an invaluable tool for researchers in public health, environmental studies, and sustainability. It offers insights into the effectiveness of the university's water treatment processes and provides real-world data for research on water safety, infrastructure, and environmental policy.

How to Access MU’s Consumer Confidence Report

The most recent Consumer Confidence Report is available online through Campus Facilities and Environmental Health & Safety (EHS). Printed copies can be requested by contacting EHS at:

Understanding the contents of the CCR ensures that your research is based on the most accurate, high-quality water possible. Whether you're working with delicate tissue cultures or running complex chemical assays, the Consumer Confidence Report is an essential tool for safeguarding the quality and reproducibility of your work. Stay informed, stay compliant, and keep your research on track with this important resource.

 

 

Whether you're a new investigator setting up your first lab or a seasoned researcher transitioning to a new space—or even preparing for retirement—clearing out or organizing a lab can be a complex and time-consuming process. Properly managing hazardous materials, ensuring regulatory compliance, and maintaining safety standards are critical steps that require careful planning. 

Fortunately, Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) provides comprehensive tools, resources, and expert guidance to streamline lab clean-outs, relocations, and closures. From chemical waste disposal to biosafety protocols, our team is here to help you navigate the process efficiently while meeting all compliance requirements. 

What You Need to Do 

Notify the Laboratory Transition Coordinator as soon as your lab assignment or relocation is confirmed. They serve as your central point of contact for all transition-related needs—coordinating lab transfers, facilitating hazmat support, and ensuring a seamless process. The sooner you notify EHS, the sooner you can begin conducting research. To remain compliant with university and federal standards, every person involved in a lab space must undergo training based on what their lab tasks will be, and more advance training is necessary for more hazardous research such as biological or radiological.   

After EHS has been notified, we will supply you with the correct information based on your transition needs. Our hazmat team works laboriously and diligently to ensure hazardous waste material is picked up in a timely and safe manner. 

Chemical Redistribution Program 

EHS helps Mizzou labs reduce waste and cut costs through its Chemical Redistribution Program. This sustainability initiative collects unused chemicals, lab equipment, and glassware from researchers who no longer need them and redistributes these materials to other university labs at no cost. By giving surplus inventory a second life, the program simultaneously minimizes hazardous waste disposal and in house lab expenses, reduces environmental impact, and supports responsible resource management across campus. Researchers interested in donating gently or unused materials or finding needed supplies are encouraged to contact EHS’s Hazmat Team to learn more about this sustainable solution for laboratory operations. 

Below, we outline key steps for new Principal Investigators (PIs) establishing a lab and departing PIs closing out their spaces. Following these guidelines will help ensure a smooth transition, minimize risks, and maintain a safe working environment for all lab personnel. 

For New PIs 
  • EHSA Access: Once registered, you and your team will gain access to the required training.  

  • Lab Setup: Ensure proper labeling and signage for hazards.  

  • Biosafety & Animal Research: Contact Biosafety at (573) 882-7018 

  • Radiation Safety: Contact Rad Safety at (573) 882-7018 

  • Chemical & Waste Management 

  • Work with the EHS Hazmat team for chemical waste disposal.  

  • Maintain an up-to-date chemical inventory. 

For Leaving/Transitioning PIs 
  • Notify EHS: Inform EHS at least six weeks before evacuation (or as soon as possible) to schedule a closeout inspection.  

  • Chemicals  

  • Gas cylinders  

  • Glassware  

  • Biological materials  

  • Radioactive materials  

  • Surplus items  

  • General trash & recycling 

  • Final Checkout 

  • Schedule a closeout walkthrough with EHS.  

Maintaining a Safe & Organized Lab 

A well-maintained lab reduces risks and improves efficiency. Follow these best practices:  

  • Label all waste containers with contents and hazard classifications.  

  • Segregate chemicals by compatibility (acids, bases, flammables, oxidizers).  

  • Dispose of waste according to regulations (hazardous, biological, non-hazardous). 

  • Regularly review and remove expired or unused chemicals. 

Subscribe to

Log in

EHS Assistant